DevOps Zone is brought to you in partnership with:

Mitch Pronschinske is a Senior Content Analyst at DZone. That means he writes and searches for the finest developer content in the land so that you don't have to. He often eats peanut butter and bananas, likes to make his own ringtones, enjoys card and board games, and is married to an underwear model. Mitch is a DZone Zone Leader and has posted 2576 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Videos: State vs. Interaction Testing & Learning to Love Your Manual Testers

05.26.2011
| 9961 views |
  • submit to reddit
At the 2010 Norwegian Developer's Conference, Hadi Hariri explained state and interaction testing so that developers could use both to their full advantage when building sturdy unit tests.  At another presentation, Karianne Berg showed attendees that manual testers still have an important place in agile development teams.  In this article you will see each of these presentations to give you a better understanding of important testing concepts and how they are carried out  by an agile development team:




Mocking frameworks allow you to stub out behaviour in order to perform tests of individual peices of functionality in isolation. However, there are times when performing certain actions and assert a result is not sufficient. In this session we will drill deep into unit testing and explain the differences between state and interaction–based testing. We will examine the role of stubs versus mocks and how to correctly write unit tests that are not fragile or counter–productive.  --Hadi Hariri



Manual testing has been marginalized in agile development. US developers seems to think that manual testing is outdated and should now be replaced by automatic test scripts. I think that manual testing should still be a part of the development process, and in this talk, you will learn why that is and how we can integrate manual testers on
agile teams.  --Karianne Berg