Timebox != Commitment
Having already given up on doing anything I needed to do tonight, I jumped into the stream to challenge this point of view. After a few back and forths I realized the disdain arose not from anything a timebox actually is, but what people confuse it with.
It seems there is an understanding of a timebox that goes something like this.
- Set a timebox size
- Commit to a bunch of work
- Realize you are failing to complete it all
- Rush to finish
- Produce crappy work
- Be exhausted
- Go to #2—repeat until dead, or company goes out of business
The only part of this that has anything to do with timeboxing is #1. The rest is about making promises you can’t keep, and doing it again and again. Timebox antagonists call this commitment.
Here’s my understanding of timeboxing.
- Set a timebox size
- Engage in dialog with requester/s. Review requests, prioritize
- Select a request, small enough to fit inside the timebox
- Complete the work to the satisfaction of the requester
- Breathe [reassess remaining requests if necessary]
- Go to #3—until there is no request that can fit in the remaining time.
- Stop work [if time remaining, take Slack time]
- Reflect. Learn from mistakes, and adapt accordingly
- Go to #2—repeat until all requests met, or deadline arrived at.
Hard to really get the essence of this in pseudocode, but I think it’s reasonably clear. There is still commitment in this description, but it is a reasonable, wise commitment. The work committed to is independent of the timebox length. The timebox is there to create rhythm, and to create space. It is a heartbeat. That’s all.
Life abounds with natural rhythm, finding our own work rhythm and honoring it is a beautiful thing. It requires release though, an alignment with life.
If you are using a timebox to force commitment in order to meet externally imposed goals, and you are not changing your behavior when this becomes apparent. Go ahead, blame the timebox. It’s easier than looking to thyself.
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)